Changes

Jump to: navigation, search

Framework for evaluation of projects in drought-prone areas

50 bytes removed, 08:51, 1 June 2012
no edit summary
====Technical====
* Are there methods of improving construction and design of existing techniques in the area which could improve water quantity?� ''E.g. telescopic lining in hand-dug well, leak-proof tanks, deep enough wells, spacing of sand dams in series, proper gravel packing in boreholes or around infiltration gallery, use of porous concrete.''* Are there methods of improving existing water quantity of existing facilities in-situ?� ''E.g. jetting in bottom of hand-dug well to increase recharge.''
* Are there alternative / additional technical options that would be suitable in the area, which could be introduced to increase water availability by maximizing rainwater capture over
groundwater abstraction?
� ''E.g. depending on site, any rainwater harvesting techniques such as groundwater dams or sub-surface tanks.
* Are there alternative / additional technical options that would be suitable in the area, which could be easier to construct?
� ''E.g. infiltration wells versus standard hand-dug wells, maximizing topography when constructing dams or ponds.
* Are there alternative / additional technical options that would be suitable in the area, which could be quicker to construct?
� ''E.g. jetted wells versus hand-dug wells.
* Are there methods of improving water quantity through increasing storage capacity?
� ''E.g. building deeper tanks, or more tanks, or reducing evaporation.
* Are there methods of improving water availability through simpler abstraction and where maintenance and repair is more likely to occur?
� ''E.g. no handump and household treatment, proven pump where spares available, simple technology repairable locally using local skills.
* Can water availability be improved through some type of Managed Aquifer Recharge (MAR)?
* Can sustainability of groundwater resources be checked through analysis of recharge and water balance?
* Has there been / is there sufficient technical expertise to ensure proper design and construction?
* Are there methods that can improve health and safety of people during construction and use of infrastructure?
� ''E.g. limit hand-dug well depth prior to lining, blocks versus pre-cast concrete rings.
* Are there water quality issues that affect water availability and can these be addressed?
� ''E.g. salinity and solar stills.
* Are there water quality issues that affect vulnerability and can these be addressed?
� ''E.g. bacteriological & chemical issues addressed through household water treatment or water source diversification.
* Are water resources monitored continually?
* Is the project timeframe likely to help improve technical viability of infrastructure?
� ''E.g. building sand dams over years = less silt build-up = more water available.
* Are there non-WASH but related activities that could reduce vulnerability?
� ''E.g. drought-resistant crop varieties.
====Institutional====
* Is the type of management structure in place the one most likely to improve water availability given the type of infrastructure?
� ''E.g. catchment-based communal association = pasture management = less siltation = more water stored.
* Would different implementation and management styles result in improved sustainability of infrastructure?
� ''E.g. communal or private ownership, decentralization.
* Would different ways of managing communal supplies improve water availability?
� ''E.g. clear regulation and audit process = more trust = money keeps flowing to keep up maintenance.
* Is the project timeframe and choice of project funding donor likely to help improve institutional management of infrastructure?
* what extent has the project truly been demand-responsive and participative, and would improving this lead to improved sustainability of infrastructure?
� ''E.g. how much continual learning and adjustment is taking place, how much were local concerns fed into design.
* What areas of project implementation could benefit from having greater involvement of local people, especially women, and could this improve sustainability of infrastructure?
� ''E.g. decision on technology, involvement in construction and maintenance, water resources monitoring.
* Are there areas of existing local knowledge that could be built on in project design, which would improve involvement of local people and sustainability of infrastructure?
� ''E.g. using local artisans, heeding ownership and regulation traditions.
* What possibilities exist to improve water availability through demand management?
� ''E.g. drip irrigation.
* Can sustainability of groundwater resources be monitored through increased cooperation (NGO, government, private sector) and application of Integrated Water Resources Management
in the area?
====Financial / economic====
* Are there ways of improving access to finance which can improve water availability?
� ''E.g. micro finance, low-cost loans.
* Are there methods of improving ownership levels of infrastructure?
� ''E.g. increased contribution including cash, private ownership.
* Are there alternative / additional technical options that would be suitable in the area, which could be cheaper to construct?
� ''E.g. more affordable storage linings, smaller tank sizes.
* Are there alternative / additional technical options that would reduce risks of failure for investors in technology?
� ''E.g. smaller structures.
* Are there methods of constructing infrastructure to make it more affordable and replicable to users?
� ''E.g. staged construction.
* Are there methods of constructing infrastructure to allow for economic use of water?
� ''E.g. private ownership, use of water for crops, living roof to reduce evaporation.
====Environmental====
Marktielewestra
Akvopedia-spade, administrator
3,247
edits
Retrieved from "https://akvopedia.org/wiki/Special:MobileDiff/11738"

Navigation menu