Difference between revisions of "Planted Drying Beds"
(→References and external links) |
|||
| (16 intermediate revisions by 4 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | + | {|style="float: left;" | |
| − | {{ | + | |{{Language-box|english_link=Planted_Drying_Beds|french_link=Lits_de_séchage_plantés|spanish_link=Lechos_de_Secado_con_Plantas|hindi_link=coming soon|malayalam_link=coming soon|tamil_link=coming soon | korean_link=coming soon | chinese_link=Coming soon | indonesian_link=Coming soon | japanese_link=Coming soon}} |
| + | |} | ||
| + | {|width="100%" | ||
| + | |style="width:50%;"|{{santable_new| | ||
sys1=[[Single Pit System |1]]| | sys1=[[Single Pit System |1]]| | ||
| − | sys2=[[Blackwater Treatment System with Infiltration| | + | sys2=[[Blackwater Treatment System with Infiltration|6]]| |
| − | sys3=[[Blackwater Treatment System with | + | sys3=[[Blackwater Treatment System with Effluent Transport|7]]| |
| − | sys4=[[(Semi-) Centralized Treatment System | | + | sys4=[[Blackwater Transport to (Semi-) Centralized Treatment System |8]]| |
| − | sys5=[[Sewerage System with Urine Diversion | | + | sys5=[[Sewerage System with Urine Diversion |9]]| |
sys6=| | sys6=| | ||
sys7=| | sys7=| | ||
sys8=| | sys8=| | ||
| + | sys9=| | ||
pic=Planted_drying_beds.png| | pic=Planted_drying_beds.png| | ||
ApplHousehold=| | ApplHousehold=| | ||
| Line 16: | Line 20: | ||
ManShared=| | ManShared=| | ||
ManPublic=XX| | ManPublic=XX| | ||
| − | Input1= | + | Input1=Sludge |Input2= |Input3= | Input4= |Input5=| |
| − | Output1= Effluent | Output2= | + | Output1= Effluent | Output2= Sludge | Output3= Biomass | Output4= | Output5= |
}} | }} | ||
| + | |[[Image:Planted_drying_beds.png |right|500px]] | ||
| + | |} | ||
| + | <br> | ||
| + | ---- | ||
| + | <br> | ||
| − | [[Image:Icon_planted_drying_beds.png |right| | + | [[Image:Icon_planted_drying_beds.png |right|80px]] |
| − | |||
| − | + | '''A planted drying bed is similar to an [[Unplanted Drying Beds|Unplanted Drying Bed]] (T.14), but has the added benefit of transpiration and enhanced sludge treatment due to the plants. The key improvement of the planted bed over the unplanted bed is that the filters do not need to be desludged after each feeding/drying cycle. Fresh sludge can be directly applied onto the previous layer; the plants and their root systems maintain the porosity of the filter.''' | |
| − | The appearance of the bed is similar to a [[Vertical Flow Constructed Wetland]]. The beds are filled with sand and gravel to support the vegetation. Instead of effluent, sludge is applied to the surface and the filtrate flows down through the subsurface | + | <br> |
| + | This technology has the benefit of dewatering and stabilizing the sludge. Also, the roots of the plants create pathways through the thickening sludge that allow water to easily escape. The appearance of the bed is similar to a [[Vertical Flow Constructed Wetland|Vertical Flow Constructed Wetland]] (T.9). The beds are filled with sand and gravel to support the vegetation. Instead of effluent, sludge is applied to the surface and the filtrate flows down through the subsurface where it is collected in drains. | ||
| − | + | ===Design Considerations=== | |
| − | + | Ventilation pipes connected to the drainage system contribute to aerobic conditions in the filter. A general design for layering the bed is: (1) 250 mm of coarse gravel (grain diameter of 20 mm); (2) 250 mm of fine gravel (grain diameter of 5 mm); and (3) 100 to 150 mm of sand. Free space (1 m) should be left above the top of the sand layer to account for about 3 to 5 years of accumulation. Reeds (Phragmites sp.), cattails (Typha sp.) antelope grass (Echinochloa sp.) and papyrus (Cyperus papyrus) are suitable plants, depending on the climate. Local, non-invasive species can be used if they grow in humid environments, are resistant to salty water and readily reproduce after cutting. | |
| − | |||
| + | Sludge should be applied in layers between 75 to 100 mm thick and reapplied every 3 to 7 days, depending on the sludge characteristics, the environment and operating constraints. Sludge application rates of 100 to 250 kg/m2/year have been reported in warm tropical climates. In colder climates, such as northern Europe, rates up to 80 kg/m2/year are typical. Two or more parallel beds can be alternately used to allow for sufficient degradation and pathogen reduction of the top layer of sludge before it is removed. The leachate that is collected in the drainage pipes must be treated properly, depending on where it is discharged. | ||
| + | <br> | ||
{{procontable | pro= | {{procontable | pro= | ||
| − | - Can handle high loading | + | - Can handle high loading <br> |
| − | - Requires large land area | + | - Better sludge treatment than in Unplanted Drying Beds <br> |
| + | - Can be built and repaired with locally available materials <br> | ||
| + | - Relatively low capital costs; low operating costs <br> | ||
| + | - Fruit or forage growing in the beds can generate income <br> | ||
| + | - No electrical energy required | ||
| + | | con= | ||
| + | - Requires a large land area <br> | ||
| + | - Odours and flies may be noticeable <br> | ||
| + | - Long storage times <br> | ||
| + | - Labour intensive removal <br> | ||
| + | - Requires expert design and construction <br> | ||
| + | - Leachate requires further treatment | ||
}} | }} | ||
| + | ===Appropriateness=== | ||
| + | This technology is effective at decreasing the sludge volume (down to 50%) through decomposition and drying, which is especially important when the sludge needs to be transported elsewhere for end-use or disposal. Because of their area requirements, planted drying beds are most appropriate for small to medium communities with populations up to 100,000 people, but they can also be used in bigger cities. If designed to service urban areas, planted drying beds should be at the border of the community, but within economic reach for motorized emptying operators. | ||
| − | = | + | ===Health Aspects/Acceptance=== |
| − | + | Because of the pleasing aesthetics, there should be few problems with acceptance, especially if located sufficiently away from dense housing. Undisturbed plantations can attract wildlife, including poisonous snakes. Faecal sludge is hazardous and anyone working with it should wear protective clothing, boots and gloves. The degree of pathogen reduction in the sludge will vary with the climate. Depending on the desired end-use, further storage and drying might be required. | |
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | ==Health Aspects/Acceptance== | ||
| − | |||
| − | Because of the pleasing aesthetics, there should be few problems with acceptance, especially if located away dense housing. Faecal sludge is hazardous and anyone working with it should wear protective clothing, boots and gloves. | ||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | The | ||
| − | |||
| − | == | + | ===Operation & Maintenance=== |
| + | Trained staff for operation and maintenance is required to ensure proper functioning. The drains must be maintained and the effluent properly collected and disposed of. The plants should have grown sufficiently before applying the sludge. The acclimation phase is crucial and requires much care. The plants should be periodically thinned and/or harvested. After 3 to 5 years the sludge can be removed. | ||
| − | * | + | ===References and external links=== |
| + | * Crites, R. and Tchobanoglous, G. (1998). Small and Decentralized Wastewater Management Systems. WCB/McGraw- Hill, New York, US. (Book) | ||
| − | * | + | * Heinss, U. and Koottatep, T. (1998). [https://ocw.un-ihe.org/pluginfile.php/4081/mod_resource/content/1/HEINSS%20and%20KOOTTATEP%201998%20Use%20of%20Reed%20Beds%20for%20FS%20Dewatering.pdf Use of Reed Beds for Faecal Sludge Dewatering. A Synopsis of Reviewed Literature and Interim Results of Pilot Investigations with Septage Treatment in Bangkok, Thailand]. Eawag (Department Sandec), Dübendorf, CH and AIT, Bangkok, TH. |
| − | * | + | * Kengne Noumsi, I. M. (2008). Potentials of Sludge Drying Beds Vegetated with Cyperus papyrus L. and Echinochloa pyramidalis (Lam.) Hitchc. & Chase for Faecal Sludge Treatment in Tropical Regions [PhD dissertation]. University of Yaounde, Yaounde, CM. |
| − | * Koottatep, T., | + | * Koottatep, T., Surinkul, N., Polprasert, C., Kamal, A. S. M., Koné, D., Montangero, A., Heinss, U. and Strauss, M. (2005). [https://www.eawag.ch/fileadmin/Domain1/Abteilungen/sandec/publikationen/EWM/Project_reports/CW_7yearresults_AIT.pdf Treatment of Septage in Constructed Wetlands in Tropical Climate – Lessons Learnt after Seven Years of Operation]. Water Science & Technology 51 (9): 119-126. |
| − | * | + | * Strande, L., Ronteltap, M. and Brdjanovic, D. (Eds.) (2014). [https://www.susana.org/en/knowledge-hub/resources-and-publications/library/details/3591 Faecal Sludge Management. Systems Approach for Implementation and Operation]. IWA Publishing, London, UK. (Detailed book compiling the current state of knowledge on all aspects related to FSM) |
| − | * Tchobanoglous, G., Burton, | + | * Tchobanoglous, G., Burton, F. L. and Stensel, H. D. (2004). Wastewater Engineering: Treatment and Reuse, Metcalf & Eddy, 4th Ed. (Internat. Ed.). McGraw-Hill, New York, US. p. 1578. (Book) |
| − | + | ===Acknowledgements=== | |
| + | {{:Acknowledgements Sanitation}} | ||
Latest revision as of 00:25, 25 February 2021
|
|
 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
A planted drying bed is similar to an Unplanted Drying Bed (T.14), but has the added benefit of transpiration and enhanced sludge treatment due to the plants. The key improvement of the planted bed over the unplanted bed is that the filters do not need to be desludged after each feeding/drying cycle. Fresh sludge can be directly applied onto the previous layer; the plants and their root systems maintain the porosity of the filter.
This technology has the benefit of dewatering and stabilizing the sludge. Also, the roots of the plants create pathways through the thickening sludge that allow water to easily escape. The appearance of the bed is similar to a Vertical Flow Constructed Wetland (T.9). The beds are filled with sand and gravel to support the vegetation. Instead of effluent, sludge is applied to the surface and the filtrate flows down through the subsurface where it is collected in drains.
Contents
Design Considerations
Ventilation pipes connected to the drainage system contribute to aerobic conditions in the filter. A general design for layering the bed is: (1) 250 mm of coarse gravel (grain diameter of 20 mm); (2) 250 mm of fine gravel (grain diameter of 5 mm); and (3) 100 to 150 mm of sand. Free space (1 m) should be left above the top of the sand layer to account for about 3 to 5 years of accumulation. Reeds (Phragmites sp.), cattails (Typha sp.) antelope grass (Echinochloa sp.) and papyrus (Cyperus papyrus) are suitable plants, depending on the climate. Local, non-invasive species can be used if they grow in humid environments, are resistant to salty water and readily reproduce after cutting.
Sludge should be applied in layers between 75 to 100 mm thick and reapplied every 3 to 7 days, depending on the sludge characteristics, the environment and operating constraints. Sludge application rates of 100 to 250 kg/m2/year have been reported in warm tropical climates. In colder climates, such as northern Europe, rates up to 80 kg/m2/year are typical. Two or more parallel beds can be alternately used to allow for sufficient degradation and pathogen reduction of the top layer of sludge before it is removed. The leachate that is collected in the drainage pipes must be treated properly, depending on where it is discharged.
| Advantages | Disadvantages/limitations |
|---|---|
| - Can handle high loading - Better sludge treatment than in Unplanted Drying Beds |
- Requires a large land area - Odours and flies may be noticeable |
Appropriateness
This technology is effective at decreasing the sludge volume (down to 50%) through decomposition and drying, which is especially important when the sludge needs to be transported elsewhere for end-use or disposal. Because of their area requirements, planted drying beds are most appropriate for small to medium communities with populations up to 100,000 people, but they can also be used in bigger cities. If designed to service urban areas, planted drying beds should be at the border of the community, but within economic reach for motorized emptying operators.
Health Aspects/Acceptance
Because of the pleasing aesthetics, there should be few problems with acceptance, especially if located sufficiently away from dense housing. Undisturbed plantations can attract wildlife, including poisonous snakes. Faecal sludge is hazardous and anyone working with it should wear protective clothing, boots and gloves. The degree of pathogen reduction in the sludge will vary with the climate. Depending on the desired end-use, further storage and drying might be required.
Operation & Maintenance
Trained staff for operation and maintenance is required to ensure proper functioning. The drains must be maintained and the effluent properly collected and disposed of. The plants should have grown sufficiently before applying the sludge. The acclimation phase is crucial and requires much care. The plants should be periodically thinned and/or harvested. After 3 to 5 years the sludge can be removed.
References and external links
- Crites, R. and Tchobanoglous, G. (1998). Small and Decentralized Wastewater Management Systems. WCB/McGraw- Hill, New York, US. (Book)
- Heinss, U. and Koottatep, T. (1998). Use of Reed Beds for Faecal Sludge Dewatering. A Synopsis of Reviewed Literature and Interim Results of Pilot Investigations with Septage Treatment in Bangkok, Thailand. Eawag (Department Sandec), Dübendorf, CH and AIT, Bangkok, TH.
- Kengne Noumsi, I. M. (2008). Potentials of Sludge Drying Beds Vegetated with Cyperus papyrus L. and Echinochloa pyramidalis (Lam.) Hitchc. & Chase for Faecal Sludge Treatment in Tropical Regions [PhD dissertation]. University of Yaounde, Yaounde, CM.
- Koottatep, T., Surinkul, N., Polprasert, C., Kamal, A. S. M., Koné, D., Montangero, A., Heinss, U. and Strauss, M. (2005). Treatment of Septage in Constructed Wetlands in Tropical Climate – Lessons Learnt after Seven Years of Operation. Water Science & Technology 51 (9): 119-126.
- Strande, L., Ronteltap, M. and Brdjanovic, D. (Eds.) (2014). Faecal Sludge Management. Systems Approach for Implementation and Operation. IWA Publishing, London, UK. (Detailed book compiling the current state of knowledge on all aspects related to FSM)
- Tchobanoglous, G., Burton, F. L. and Stensel, H. D. (2004). Wastewater Engineering: Treatment and Reuse, Metcalf & Eddy, 4th Ed. (Internat. Ed.). McGraw-Hill, New York, US. p. 1578. (Book)
Acknowledgements
The material on this page was adapted from:
Elizabeth Tilley, Lukas Ulrich, Christoph Lüthi, Philippe Reymond and Christian Zurbrügg (2014). Compendium of Sanitation Systems and Technologies, published by Sandec, the Department of Water and Sanitation in Developing Countries of Eawag, the Swiss Federal Institute of Aquatic Science and Technology, Dübendorf, Switzerland.
The 2nd edition publication is available in English. French and Spanish are yet to come.
