Akvopedia-spade, akvouser, bot, bureaucrat, emailconfirmed, smwadministrator, smwcurator, susana-working-group-susana-member, administrator, widget editor
697
edits
Changes
→References
{|width="100%"
|style="width:50%;"|{{santable_new|
sys7=|
sys8=|
sys9=|
pic=Single_ventilated_improved_pit.png|
ApplHousehold=XX|
Input1=Excreta|Input2=Blackwater |Input3=Faeces | Input4=Anal cleansing water |Input5=Dry Cleansing Materials|
Output1=Sludge| Output2= | Output3= | Output4= | Output5=
}}
|[[Image:Single_ventilated_improved_pit.png |right|300px500px]]
|}
<br>
----
<br>
[[Image:Icon_single_ventilated_improved_pit.png |right|80px]]
'''The Single VIP is a ventilated, improved pit. It is an improvement over the [[Single Pit | Single Pit]] (S.2) because continuous airflow through the ventilation pipe vents odours and acts as a trap for flies as they escape towards the light.'''
Despite their simplicity, well-designed single VIPs can be completely smell free, and more pleasant to use than some other water-based technologies. Flies that hatch in the pit are attracted to the light at the top of the ventilation pipe. When they fly towards the light and try to escape, they are trapped by the flyscreen and die. The ventilation also allows odours to escape and minimizes the attraction for flies.
the pit (cool) and the vent (warm) creates an updraft that pulls the air and odours up and out of the pit. To test the efficacy of the ventilation, a lit cigarette can be held over the User Interface; the smoke should be pulled down into the pit and up into the vent and not remain in the superstructure. The mesh size of the fly screen must be large enough to prevent clogging with dust and allow air to circulate freely. Aluminium screens, with a hole-size of 1.2 to 1.5 mm, have proven to be the most effective. Typically, the pit is at least 3 m deep and 1 to 1.5 m in diameter, depending on the number of users. Deep pits can last up to 20 or more years.
As liquid leaches from the pit and migrates through the unsaturated soil matrix, pathogenic germs are sorbed to the soil surface. In this way, pathogens can be removed prior to contact with groundwater. The degree of removal varies with soil type, distance travelled, moisture and other environmental factors and, thus, it is difficult to estimate the distance necessary between a pit and awater source. A minimum horizontal distance of 30 m between a pit and a water source and 2 m between the bottom of the pit and the groundwater table is normally recommended to limit exposure to microbial contamination.
When it is not possible to dig a deep pit or the groundwater level is too high, a raised pit can be a viable alternative: the shallow pit can be extended by building the pit upwards with the use of concrete rings or blocks. A raised pit can also be constructed in an area where flooding is frequent in order to keep water from flowing into the pit during heavy rain.
A single VIP toilet can be upgraded to a [[Double Ventilated Improved Pit | Double VIP ]] (S.4). A Double VIP has an extra pit so that while one is in use, the contents of the full pit are allowed to drain, mature and degrade. If a urine-diverting User Interface is used, only faeces are collected in the pit and leaching can be minimized.
<br>
- Low reduction in BOD and pathogens with possible contamination of groundwater. <br> - Costs to empty may be significant compared to capital costs. <br> - Sludge requires secondary treatment and/or appropriate discharge.
}}
===Appropriateness===
Treatment processes in the single VIP (aerobic, anaerobic, dehydration, composting, or otherwise) are limited, and, therefore, pathogen reduction and organic degradation is not significant. However, since the excreta are contained, pathogen transmission to the user is limited. This technology is a significant improvement over Single Pits or open defecation.
Single VIPs are appropriate for rural and peri-urban areas; in densely populated areas they are often difficult to empty and/or have insufficient space for infiltration. VIPs are especially appropriate when water is scarce and where there is a low groundwater table.They should be located in an area with a good breeze to ensure effective ventilation. They are not suited for rocky or compacted soils (that are difficult to dig) or for areas that flood frequently.
===Health Aspects/Acceptance===
===References ===
* Mara, D. D. (1984). [https://www.pseau.org/outils/ouvrages/world_bank_the_design_of_ventilated_lmproved_pit_latrines_1984.pdf The Design of Ventilated Improved Pit Latrines]. UNDP Interregional Project INT/81/047, The World Bank and UNDP, Washington, D.C., US. Available at: documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/home * Mara, D. D. (1996). Low-Cost Urban Sanitation. Wiley, Chichester, UK. (Provides Book; provides detailed design information) * Morgan, P. R. (2009). [http://www.ecosanres.org/pdf_files/EcologicalToilets-PeterMorgan-Mar2009.pdf Ecological Toilets. Start Simple and Upgrade from Arborloo to VIP]. Stockholm Environment Institute,Stockholm, SE. Available at: www.ecosanres.org * Morgan, P. R. (2011). [http://www.ecosanres.org/pdf_files/Builders_Detailed_Manual_Upgradeable_%20Blair_VIP.pdf The Blair VIP toilet]. Manual for Upgradeable BVIP Model with Spiral Superstructure and Tubular Vent. Stockholm Environment Institute, Stockholm, SE. Available at: www.ecosanres.org (Provides detailed design and construction information) * Ryan, B. A. and Mara, D. D. (1983). [http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/412331468199470290/pdf/TAG6000Ventila0pe0design0guidelines.pdf Ventilated Improved Pit Latrines: Vent Pipe Design Guidelines]. UNDP Interregional Project INT/81/047, The World Bank and UNDP, Washington, D.C., US. Available at: documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/home
See S.2 for additional reading materials.
===Acknowledgements===
{{:Acknowledgements Sanitation}}
