Drip Irrigation - Pepsi and Nica

From Akvopedia
Revision as of 12:57, 4 August 2007 by Almerheim (talk | contribs) (New page: right Drip irrigation reduces water consumption but conventional drip technology is "high-tech" and expensive. To make drip irrigation affordable for smal...)

(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to: navigation, search
Pepsi drip icon.png

Drip irrigation reduces water consumption but conventional drip technology is "high-tech" and expensive. To make drip irrigation affordable for small farmers, the Chapin bucket or IDE bucket and drum kits were developed and are now being promoted in many countries. A bucket kit costing US$ 5 can irrigate 25 m2 and a drum kit five times as much. Based on this principle, farmers in India started to make their own drip system, made of plastic hose that is normally used to package ice-lollies. Hoses can only be used for one growing season (generating plastic waste) but investment costs are so low that it is not a risk for poor families to invest in it. This technology now more or less promotes itself.

Easy drip irrigation

An improvement of Pepsi drip is the so-called Easy drip that consists of sun resistant lay-flat hoses and micro tubes that have a lifetime of 1-2 years. This option is being developed by IDE and applied in Asia. Practica foundation is testing different options in Nicaragua, Tanzania, Zambia and Ghana.

Low cost plastic hose, used for drip irrigation
Advantages Disadvantages
Reduces water consumption.
Hoses have a short lifetime (generating plastic waste).


Capacity

0.1 - 2 ha

Costs

Cost/ha: Pepsi drip: US$ 60 (plastic hose only). Easy drip: US$ 200 ­ 400.

Applying conditions

Numbers: Pepsi drip 2,000 systems. Easy drip 20 -­ 40,000 in Asia.

External links

www.cgiar.org/iwmi www.ideorg.org www.practicafoundation.nl