Difference between revisions of "Surface Disposal and Storage"
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| + | <small-title /> | ||
<!-- table at top of page with logo, picture, Application level, Management level, and input-output tables --> | <!-- table at top of page with logo, picture, Application level, Management level, and input-output tables --> | ||
{|width="100%" | {|width="100%" | ||
| Line 25: | Line 26: | ||
|[[Image:Surface_disposal.png |right|300px]] | |[[Image:Surface_disposal.png |right|300px]] | ||
|} | |} | ||
| − | [[Image:Icon_surface_disposal.png |right| | + | |
| + | <br> | ||
| + | ---- | ||
| + | <br> | ||
| + | |||
| + | [[Image:Icon_surface_disposal.png |right|80px]] | ||
'''Surface Disposal refers to the stockpiling of sludge, faeces, biosolids, or other materials that cannot be used elsewhere. Once the material has been taken to a Surface Disposal site, it is not used later. This technology is primarily used for biosolids, although it is applicable for any type of dry, unusable material.''' | '''Surface Disposal refers to the stockpiling of sludge, faeces, biosolids, or other materials that cannot be used elsewhere. Once the material has been taken to a Surface Disposal site, it is not used later. This technology is primarily used for biosolids, although it is applicable for any type of dry, unusable material.''' | ||
| Line 34: | Line 40: | ||
Landfilling biosolids along with Municipal Solid Waste (MSW) is not advisable since it reduces the life of a landfill which has been designed for the containment of more noxious materials. As opposed to more centralized MSW landfills, Surface Disposal sites can be situated close to where the faecal sludge is treated, limiting the need for long transport distances. | Landfilling biosolids along with Municipal Solid Waste (MSW) is not advisable since it reduces the life of a landfill which has been designed for the containment of more noxious materials. As opposed to more centralized MSW landfills, Surface Disposal sites can be situated close to where the faecal sludge is treated, limiting the need for long transport distances. | ||
| + | <br> | ||
{{procontable | pro= | {{procontable | pro= | ||
- Can make use of vacant or abandoned land. <br> - Low cost. <br> - May prevent unmitigated disposal. | con= | - Can make use of vacant or abandoned land. <br> - Low cost. <br> - May prevent unmitigated disposal. | con= | ||
| Line 39: | Line 46: | ||
}} | }} | ||
| − | ==Adequacy== | + | ===Adequacy=== |
Since there are no benefits gained from this type of disposal technology, it should not be considered as a primary option. However, where acceptance towards biosolid use does not exist, the contained and controlled stockpiling of biosolids is far preferable to uncontrolled dumping. Biosolids can be applied in almost every climate and environment, although they should not be stored where there is frequent flooding or where the groundwater table is high. | Since there are no benefits gained from this type of disposal technology, it should not be considered as a primary option. However, where acceptance towards biosolid use does not exist, the contained and controlled stockpiling of biosolids is far preferable to uncontrolled dumping. Biosolids can be applied in almost every climate and environment, although they should not be stored where there is frequent flooding or where the groundwater table is high. | ||
| − | ==Health Aspects/Acceptance== | + | ===Health Aspects/Acceptance=== |
Since the Surface Disposal site is located far from and protected from the public, there should be no risk of contact or nuisance. Care should be taken to protect the disposal site from vermin and from pooling water, both of which could exacerbate smell and vector problems. | Since the Surface Disposal site is located far from and protected from the public, there should be no risk of contact or nuisance. Care should be taken to protect the disposal site from vermin and from pooling water, both of which could exacerbate smell and vector problems. | ||
| − | ==Maintenance== | + | ===Maintenance=== |
Maintenance staff should ensure that only appropriate materials are disposed of at the site, and must maintain control over the traffic and hours of operation. | Maintenance staff should ensure that only appropriate materials are disposed of at the site, and must maintain control over the traffic and hours of operation. | ||
| − | = | + | ===References and external links=== |
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | ==References and external links== | ||
* U.S. EPA (1999). Biosolids Generation, Use, and Disposal in the United States, EPA-530/R-99-009. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency: Washington, D.C. Available: http://www.epa.gov | * U.S. EPA (1999). Biosolids Generation, Use, and Disposal in the United States, EPA-530/R-99-009. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency: Washington, D.C. Available: http://www.epa.gov | ||
* U.S. EPA (1994). A Plain English Guide to the EPA Part 503 Biosolids Rule. EPA832-R-93-003. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency: Washington, D.C. Available: http://www.epa.gov | * U.S. EPA (1994). A Plain English Guide to the EPA Part 503 Biosolids Rule. EPA832-R-93-003. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency: Washington, D.C. Available: http://www.epa.gov | ||
| + | |||
| + | ===Acknowledgements=== | ||
| + | {{:Acknowledgements Sanitation}} | ||
Revision as of 00:48, 27 September 2013
|
 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Surface Disposal refers to the stockpiling of sludge, faeces, biosolids, or other materials that cannot be used elsewhere. Once the material has been taken to a Surface Disposal site, it is not used later. This technology is primarily used for biosolids, although it is applicable for any type of dry, unusable material.
One application of Surface Disposal that is shown on the System Templates is the disposal of dry cleansing materials, such as toilet paper, corn cobs, stones, newspaper and/or leaves. These materials can not always be included along with other water-based products in some technologies and must be separated. A rubbish bin should be provided beside the User Interface to collect the cleansing materials. Dry materials can be burned (e.g. corn cobs) or disposed of along with the household waste. For simplicity, the remainder of this Technology Information Sheet will be dedicated to faecal sludge, since standard solid-waste practices are beyond the scope of this Compendium.
When there is no demand or acceptance for the beneficial use of biosolids, they can be placed in monofills (biosolids-only landfills) or heaped into permanent piles. The main difference between Surface Disposal and Land Application is the application rate. There is no limit to the quantity of biosolids that can be applied to the surface since there are no concerns about nutrient loads or agronomic rates. There is however, concern related to groundwater contamination and leaching. More advanced surface disposal systems may incorporate a liner and leachate collection system in order to prevent nutrients and contaminants from infiltrating the groundwater.
Landfilling biosolids along with Municipal Solid Waste (MSW) is not advisable since it reduces the life of a landfill which has been designed for the containment of more noxious materials. As opposed to more centralized MSW landfills, Surface Disposal sites can be situated close to where the faecal sludge is treated, limiting the need for long transport distances.
| Advantages | Disadvantages/limitations |
|---|---|
| - Can make use of vacant or abandoned land. - Low cost. - May prevent unmitigated disposal. |
- Non-beneficial use of a resource. - Odours are normally noticeable (depending on prior treatment). - May require special spreading equipment. - May require special spreading equipment. - Micropollutants may accumulate in the soil and contaminate groundwater. |
Contents
Adequacy
Since there are no benefits gained from this type of disposal technology, it should not be considered as a primary option. However, where acceptance towards biosolid use does not exist, the contained and controlled stockpiling of biosolids is far preferable to uncontrolled dumping. Biosolids can be applied in almost every climate and environment, although they should not be stored where there is frequent flooding or where the groundwater table is high.
Health Aspects/Acceptance
Since the Surface Disposal site is located far from and protected from the public, there should be no risk of contact or nuisance. Care should be taken to protect the disposal site from vermin and from pooling water, both of which could exacerbate smell and vector problems.
Maintenance
Maintenance staff should ensure that only appropriate materials are disposed of at the site, and must maintain control over the traffic and hours of operation.
References and external links
- U.S. EPA (1999). Biosolids Generation, Use, and Disposal in the United States, EPA-530/R-99-009. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency: Washington, D.C. Available: http://www.epa.gov
- U.S. EPA (1994). A Plain English Guide to the EPA Part 503 Biosolids Rule. EPA832-R-93-003. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency: Washington, D.C. Available: http://www.epa.gov
Acknowledgements
The material on this page was adapted from:
Elizabeth Tilley, Lukas Ulrich, Christoph Lüthi, Philippe Reymond and Christian Zurbrügg (2014). Compendium of Sanitation Systems and Technologies, published by Sandec, the Department of Water and Sanitation in Developing Countries of Eawag, the Swiss Federal Institute of Aquatic Science and Technology, Dübendorf, Switzerland.
The 2nd edition publication is available in English. French and Spanish are yet to come.
