Difference between revisions of "Bamboo screens"
m (→Applying conditions) |
m (→Costs) |
||
| Line 23: | Line 23: | ||
== Costs == | == Costs == | ||
| − | New screen | + | New screen costs 20% of a conventional model. |
== Applying conditions == | == Applying conditions == | ||
Revision as of 10:38, 30 May 2008
Small-scale irrigation in India usually involves the use of diesel or electric-powered suction pumps, drawing water from water tables down to 7 m deep. The India-North Bengal Terai Development Project carried out pump energy analysis, which showed that tube well screens excessively restricted water flow, resulting in low overall pumping efficiency. Improving these screens resulted in a reduction of fuel consumption of over 40%. Since publication of this innovation, thousands of wells have been fitted with the new screens, with benefits for the profitability of farming and for reducing CO2 emissions.
| Advantages | Disadvantages |
|---|---|
| Reduce fuel consumption of irrigation. |
|
Capacity
15 litres / sec (3 inch well, length of screen 4 meter).
Costs
New screen costs 20% of a conventional model.
Applying conditions
Mainly applied for irrigation purposes.
External links
- www.practicafoundation.nl Practica Foundation
- www.teriin.org TERI (In 2002, TERI published a book on the subject, entitled Technology innovation and promotion in practice: pumps, channels and wells.)
