Difference between revisions of "Solution of the week 3"
m (Tag: Visual edit) |
|||
| (4 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
In the USA, chlorine began to be widely used as a disinfectant in the early 1900s, and it is credited with playing a key role in increasing American life expectancy from 45 in the early 1900s to about 76 years at present, an increase of 50%. No more cholera, typhoid fever, and dysentery. Today, 98% of all drinking water purification in the USA uses chlorine. Very useful stuff to have around. So what about its use in developing countries? | In the USA, chlorine began to be widely used as a disinfectant in the early 1900s, and it is credited with playing a key role in increasing American life expectancy from 45 in the early 1900s to about 76 years at present, an increase of 50%. No more cholera, typhoid fever, and dysentery. Today, 98% of all drinking water purification in the USA uses chlorine. Very useful stuff to have around. So what about its use in developing countries? | ||
| − | The problem is that in many developing countries, chlorine is imported, rather than produced locally. This leads to a much higher price, as transportation and storage add to the costs. In remote areas, the delivery chain can easily fall apart, preventing this life-saving substance from reaching the people who need it most. | + | The problem is that in many developing countries, chlorine is imported, rather than produced locally. This leads to a much higher price, as transportation and storage add to the costs. In remote areas, the delivery chain can easily fall apart, preventing this life-saving substance from reaching the people who need it most. |
| + | [[Image:Tinkisso team holding Wata Standard.png|thumb|right|200px| Employees from [https://www.antenna.ch/en/water-hygiene/guinea/ Tinkisso-Antenna] produce sodium hypochlorite using the WATA-Standard (pictured) and sold under the brand name Chlor'C throughout Guinea. Photo: Antenna Technologies.]] | ||
| − | + | ===Empowering communities to produce their own water disinfectant=== | |
| + | The good news: chlorine is really, really easy to produce. One device (there are more) that accomplishes this is the WATA® developed by the Swiss organization Antenna Foundation. A container with a [https://www.antenna.ch/en/water-hygiene/ WATA® device] is filled with brine, an electrical current is run through the brine for a certain amount of time, and voilà. (For the technically inclined, the current turns sodium chloride into sodium hypochlorite). One litre of the resulting solution is enough to disinfect 3,300 litres of drinking water. The solution is bottled and sold by local entrepreneurs, and distributed in retailer shops, or sold usually by women. | ||
| − | + | Chlorine also comes with its own safety system: if your nose tells you there is too much chlorine in the water, there probably is. The strong smell from water with too much chlorine will probably put you off drinking it long before the concentration actually becomes dangerous. For more information about the advantages and disadvantages of disinfecting water with sodium hypochlorite, and chlorine in general, see the Akvopedia articles referenced below. | |
| − | |||
| − | + | Although other methods of disinfection such as using ozone and UV-light treatment might win out in the long run for water disinfection, chlorine remain an important technique for treating water in countries around the world. Chlorine is also useful for disinfecting institutions large and small, such as health facilities, prisons ,and schools. Many facilities in some low-income regions in the world lack access to the quality disinfectants needed to ensure high hygiene standards. A reliable supply of cheap chlorine, such as that enabled by the WATA® devices, can help staff at these institutions prevent the spread of illness, in addition to treating drinking water. All of this underscores the important role chlorine will play in promoting public health in many regions for the foreseeable future. | |
| − | + | ===Additional links:=== | |
| − | |||
| − | Additional links: | ||
*[[Akvo water solution of the week|Other blogs in this series]] | *[[Akvo water solution of the week|Other blogs in this series]] | ||
| − | *[http://www.antenna.ch/en/research/safe-water | + | *[http://www.antenna.ch/en/research/safe-water Antenna Foundation's approach to ensuring access to sanitation and clean drinking water] |
| − | *[[WATAsol|Akvopedia article on | + | *[[WATAsol|Akvopedia article on the WATA® range of devices]] |
*Articles on [[Chlorine_%28Sodium_Hypochlorite%29|Chlorine solutions]] and [[Chlorine_%28NaDCC%29| Chlorine tablets]] | *Articles on [[Chlorine_%28Sodium_Hypochlorite%29|Chlorine solutions]] and [[Chlorine_%28NaDCC%29| Chlorine tablets]] | ||
Latest revision as of 09:09, 21 January 2021
Tried and true - treating water with chlorine
Do you like chlorine? I do. Although I might not particularly like the taste of it, it is by far the easiest and cheapest way to disinfect water and make it drinkable, and it probably helped to save more lives than any other single chemical substance on Earth. Using simple techniques, it can be produced and sold locally in developing countries.
In the USA, chlorine began to be widely used as a disinfectant in the early 1900s, and it is credited with playing a key role in increasing American life expectancy from 45 in the early 1900s to about 76 years at present, an increase of 50%. No more cholera, typhoid fever, and dysentery. Today, 98% of all drinking water purification in the USA uses chlorine. Very useful stuff to have around. So what about its use in developing countries?
The problem is that in many developing countries, chlorine is imported, rather than produced locally. This leads to a much higher price, as transportation and storage add to the costs. In remote areas, the delivery chain can easily fall apart, preventing this life-saving substance from reaching the people who need it most.
Empowering communities to produce their own water disinfectant
The good news: chlorine is really, really easy to produce. One device (there are more) that accomplishes this is the WATA® developed by the Swiss organization Antenna Foundation. A container with a WATA® device is filled with brine, an electrical current is run through the brine for a certain amount of time, and voilà. (For the technically inclined, the current turns sodium chloride into sodium hypochlorite). One litre of the resulting solution is enough to disinfect 3,300 litres of drinking water. The solution is bottled and sold by local entrepreneurs, and distributed in retailer shops, or sold usually by women.
Chlorine also comes with its own safety system: if your nose tells you there is too much chlorine in the water, there probably is. The strong smell from water with too much chlorine will probably put you off drinking it long before the concentration actually becomes dangerous. For more information about the advantages and disadvantages of disinfecting water with sodium hypochlorite, and chlorine in general, see the Akvopedia articles referenced below.
Although other methods of disinfection such as using ozone and UV-light treatment might win out in the long run for water disinfection, chlorine remain an important technique for treating water in countries around the world. Chlorine is also useful for disinfecting institutions large and small, such as health facilities, prisons ,and schools. Many facilities in some low-income regions in the world lack access to the quality disinfectants needed to ensure high hygiene standards. A reliable supply of cheap chlorine, such as that enabled by the WATA® devices, can help staff at these institutions prevent the spread of illness, in addition to treating drinking water. All of this underscores the important role chlorine will play in promoting public health in many regions for the foreseeable future.
