Difference between revisions of "Groundwater - Stone hammer well drilling"
m |
m (Changed picture text) |
||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
The Stone-hammer method has won a competition for innovative irrigation technologies organized by the World Bank, Winrock and IDE (International Development Enterprises). | The Stone-hammer method has won a competition for innovative irrigation technologies organized by the World Bank, Winrock and IDE (International Development Enterprises). | ||
| − | [[Image:Stone_hammer_well_drilling.PNG|thumb|right|150px|The Stone-hammer in | + | [[Image:Stone_hammer_well_drilling.PNG|thumb|right|150px|The Stone-hammer in Nicaragua, drilling a 20 m deep well in a stony layer ]] |
{| border="1" cellpadding="5" cellspacing="0" align="center" | {| border="1" cellpadding="5" cellspacing="0" align="center" | ||
Revision as of 18:28, 30 July 2007
The previous drilling methods are not suitable for hard soil formations, so ongoing development led to the Stone-hammer. This method consists of a heavy hammer hitting directly on a hollow drill-head. Although it does not penetrate very hard stone such as basalt, it is a tougher option than the Rota-sludge method. This technology is being refined further in India and Nicaragua.
The Stone-hammer method has won a competition for innovative irrigation technologies organized by the World Bank, Winrock and IDE (International Development Enterprises).
| Advantages | Disadvantages |
|---|---|
| Cheaper and easier to maintain than motorized drilling rigs. Drill in very hard soil |
Slower than motorized drilling rigs. |
Capacity
2-5 inch wells to 40 meter.
Costs
20-60% less then hand dug wells.
Applying conditions
Cost of introduction: Variable US$ 15,000 - 30,000 per project, including: production drill set, drawings, hands-on training, first wells.
