Difference between revisions of "Application of Dehydrated Faeces"

From Akvopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
Line 19: Line 19:
 
ManPublic=X|
 
ManPublic=X|
 
Input1=Dried Faeces |Input2= |Input3= | Input4= |Input5=|
 
Input1=Dried Faeces |Input2= |Input3= | Input4= |Input5=|
Output1=- |Output2= | Output3= | Output4= | Output5=
+
Output1=Biomass |Output2= | Output3= | Output4= | Output5=
 
|english_link=Application_of_Dehydrated_Faeces
 
|english_link=Application_of_Dehydrated_Faeces
 
|french_link=Application_des_fèces_déshydratées
 
|french_link=Application_des_fèces_déshydratées
Line 32: Line 32:
  
 
[[Image:Icon_application_of_dehydrated_faeces.png |right|80px]]
 
[[Image:Icon_application_of_dehydrated_faeces.png |right|80px]]
'''When faeces are stored in the absence of moisture (i.e. urine) they dehydrate into a crumbly, white-beige coarse, flaky material or powder. Dehydration means that the moisture naturally present in the faeces evaporates and/or is absorbed by the addition of a drying material (e.g. ash, sawdust, lime).'''
+
''When faeces are stored in the absence of moisture (i.e., urine), they dehydrate into a crumbly, white-beige, coarse, flaky material or powder. The moisture naturally present in the faeces evaporates and/or is absorbed by the drying material (e.g., ash, sawdust, lime) that is added to them. Dried faeces can be used as a soil conditioner.'''
  
Dehydration is different from composting because the organic material present is not degraded or transformed; only the moisture is removed. After dehydration, faeces will reduce in volume by about 75%. The shells and carcasses of worms and insects that also dehydrate will remain in the dried faeces.
+
Dehydration is different from composting because the organic material present is not degraded or transformed; only the moisture is removed. Faeces will reduce in volume by about 75% after dehydration. Completely dry faeces are a crumbly, powdery substance. The shells and carcasses of worms and insects in the faeces also dehydrate and become part of the dried material. The material is rich in carbon and nutrients, but may still contain protozoan cysts or oocysts (spores that can survive extreme environmental conditions and
 +
be re-animated under favourable conditions) and other pathogens. The degree of pathogen inactivation will depend on the temperature, the pH (using ash or lime raises the pH) and storage time. It is generally accepted that faeces should be stored between 6 to 24 months, although pathogens may still exist after this time (refer to WHO guidelines for specific guidance).
  
The degree of pathogen inactivation will depend on the temperature, the pH (e.g. lime raises the pH) and storage time. It is generally accepted that faeces should be stored between 12 to 18 months, although pathogens may still exist after this time.
+
The material can be mixed into soil for agriculture (depending on acceptance) or safely mixed into soil or buried elsewhere. Extended storage is also an option if there is no immediate use for the material (see D.12).
 
 
When the faeces are completely dry they will emerge as a crumbly, powdery substance. The material is rich in carbon and nutrients, but may still contain pathogens or oocysts (spores which can survive extreme environmental conditions and re-animate under favourable conditions). The material can be mixed into soil, either for agriculture or at another site (depending on acceptance).
 
 
 
Faeces that are dried and stored between 2 and 20°C should be stored for between 1.5 to 2 years before they are used at the household or regional level. At higher temperatures (i.e. greater than 20°C) storage over one year is recommended to inactivate Ascaris eggs (a type of parasitic worm). A shorter storage time of six months is required if the faeces have a pH above 9 (i.e. lime will increase the pH of the faeces). The WHO has published guidelines and these should be consulted before using dried faeces.
 
  
 +
===Design Considerations===
 +
Faeces that are dried and kept at between 2 and 20 °C should be stored for 1.5 to 2 years before being used at the household or regional level. At higher temperatures (i.e., >20 °C average), storage over 1 year is recommended to inactivate Ascaris eggs (a type of parasitic worm). A shorter storage time of 6 months is required if the faeces have a pH above 9 (i.e., adding ash or lime increases the pH). WHO guidelines concerning the use of excreta in agriculture should be consulted beforehand.
  
 +
<br>
 
{{procontable | pro=
 
{{procontable | pro=
- Can improve the structure and water-holding capacity of soil. <br> - Simple technique for all users. <br> - Low cost. <br> - Low risk of pathogen transmission. <br> - May encourage income generation (tree planting. | con=
+
- Can improve the structure and water-holding capacity of soil <br>
- Labour intensive. <br> - Pathogens may exist in a dormant stage (oocysts) which may become infectious if moisture is added. <br> - Does not replace fertilizer (N, P, K).
+
- Low risk of pathogen transmission <br>
 +
- Low costs
 +
| con=
 +
- Labour intensive <br>
 +
- Pathogens may exist in a dormant stage (cysts and oocysts) which may become infectious if moisture is added <br>
 +
- Does not replace fertilizer (N, P, K) <br>
 +
- Social acceptance may be low in some areas
 
}}
 
}}
 +
<br>
  
===Adequacy===
+
===Appropriateness===  
 +
Dried faeces are not as useful as a soil amendment as composted faeces. However, they can help to replenish poor soil and to boost the carbon and water-storing properties of soil, while posing low risk of pathogen transmission.
  
Dried faeces are not as well treated or as useful as a soil amendment as composted faeces. However, they are useful at replenishing poor soils and for boosting the carbon and water-storing properties of a soil with low-risk of pathogen transmission.
+
===Health Aspects/Acceptance===
 +
The handling and use of dried faeces may not be acceptable to some people. However, because dehydrated faeces should be dry, crumbly, and odour free, using them might be easier to accept than manure or sludge. Dry faeces are a hostile environment for organisms and they do not survive long in it. If water or urine is mixed with the drying faeces, however, odours and organisms may become problematic because bacteria easily survive and multiply in wet faeces. Warm, moist environments are conducive to anaerobic processes, which can generate offensive odours.
  
===Health Aspects/Acceptance===
+
Dehydrated faeces should not be applied to crops less than one month before they are harvested. This waiting period is especially important for crops that are consumed raw.
  
The handing and use of dried faeces may not be acceptable to some. However, because the dried faeces should be dry, crumbly, and odour free, the use of dried faeces may be more acceptable than that of manure or sludge. Dry faeces are a hostile environment for organisms and consequently, they do not survive (for long). If water or urine mixes with the drying faeces, odours and organisms may become problematic; wet faeces allow bacteria to survive and multiply. A warm, moist environment will permit anaerobic processes to generate offensive odours.
+
===Operation & Maintenance===
 +
When removing dehydrated faeces from dehydration vaults, care must be taken to prevent the powder from blowing and being inhaled. Workers should wear appropriate protective clothing. Faeces should be kept as dry as possible. If by accident, water or urine enters and mixes with drying faeces, more ash, lime or dry soil should be added to help absorb the moisture. Prevention is the best way to keep
 +
faeces dry.
  
When removing the dehydrated faeces from the dehydration vaults, care must be taken to prevent the power from blowing and being inhaled.
+
===References===
 
 
===Maintenance===
 
 
 
Faeces should be kept as dry as possible. If by accident, water or urine enters mixes with the drying faeces, more ash, lime or dry soil can be added to help absorb the moisture. Prevention is the best way of keeping the faeces dry.
 
  
===References===
+
* Austin, A. and Duncker, L. (2002). Urine-Diversion. Ecological Sanitation Systems in South Africa. CSIR, Pretoria, ZA.
  
* Austin, A. and Duncker, L. (2002). Urine-diversion. Ecological Sanitation Systems in South Africa. CSIR, Pretoria.
+
* Rieck, C., von Münch, E. and Hoffmann, H. (2012). Technology Review of Urine-Diverting Dry Toilets (UDDTs). Overview of Design, Operation, Management and Costs. Deutsche Gesellschaft für Internationale Zusammenarbeit (GIZ) GmbH, Eschborn, DE.
 +
:Available at: [http://www.susana.org/library susana.org/library]
  
* Schonning, C. and Stenstrom, TA. (2004). Guidelines for the Safe Use of Urine and Faeces in Ecological Sanitation Systems-Report 2004-1. EcosanRes, Stockholm Environment Institute, Stockholm, Sweden. Available: http://www.ecosanres.org
+
* Schönning, C. and Stenström, T. A. (2004). Guidelines for the Safe Use of Urine and Faeces in Ecological Sanitation Systems. Report 2004-1. EcoSanRes, Stockholm Environment Institute, Stockholm, SE.
 +
:Available at: [http://www.ecosanres.org ecosanres.org]
  
* WHO (2006). Guidelines for the safe use of wastewater, excreta and greywater – Volume 4: Excreta and greywater use in agriculture. WHO, Geneva. Available: http://www.who.int
+
* WHO (2006). Guidelines for the Safe Use of Wastewater, Excreta and Greywater. Volume 4: Excreta and Greywater Use in Agriculture. World Health Organization, Geneva, CH.
 +
:Available at: [http://www.who.int who.int]
  
* Winblad, U. and Simpson-Herbert, M. (eds.) (2004). Ecological Sanitation- revised and enlarged edition. Stockholm Environment Institute, Stockholm, Sweden. Available: http://www.ecosanres.org
+
* Winblad, U. and Simpson-Hébert, M. (Eds.) (2004). Ecological Sanitation. Revised and Enlarged Edition. Stockholm Environment Institute, Stockholm, SE.
 +
:Available at: [http://www.ecosanres.org ecosanres.org]
  
 
===Acknowledgements===
 
===Acknowledgements===
 
{{:Acknowledgements Sanitation}}
 
{{:Acknowledgements Sanitation}}

Revision as of 02:48, 30 October 2014

Applicable in systems:
4 , {{{sys9}}}
Level of Application
Household XX
Neighbourhood X
City

 

Inputs
Dried Faeces


Level of management
Household XX
Shared XX
Public X

 

Outputs
Biomass
Application of dehydrated faeces.png




Icon application of dehydrated faeces.png

When faeces are stored in the absence of moisture (i.e., urine), they dehydrate into a crumbly, white-beige, coarse, flaky material or powder. The moisture naturally present in the faeces evaporates and/or is absorbed by the drying material (e.g., ash, sawdust, lime) that is added to them. Dried faeces can be used as a soil conditioner.'

Dehydration is different from composting because the organic material present is not degraded or transformed; only the moisture is removed. Faeces will reduce in volume by about 75% after dehydration. Completely dry faeces are a crumbly, powdery substance. The shells and carcasses of worms and insects in the faeces also dehydrate and become part of the dried material. The material is rich in carbon and nutrients, but may still contain protozoan cysts or oocysts (spores that can survive extreme environmental conditions and be re-animated under favourable conditions) and other pathogens. The degree of pathogen inactivation will depend on the temperature, the pH (using ash or lime raises the pH) and storage time. It is generally accepted that faeces should be stored between 6 to 24 months, although pathogens may still exist after this time (refer to WHO guidelines for specific guidance).

The material can be mixed into soil for agriculture (depending on acceptance) or safely mixed into soil or buried elsewhere. Extended storage is also an option if there is no immediate use for the material (see D.12).

Design Considerations

Faeces that are dried and kept at between 2 and 20 °C should be stored for 1.5 to 2 years before being used at the household or regional level. At higher temperatures (i.e., >20 °C average), storage over 1 year is recommended to inactivate Ascaris eggs (a type of parasitic worm). A shorter storage time of 6 months is required if the faeces have a pH above 9 (i.e., adding ash or lime increases the pH). WHO guidelines concerning the use of excreta in agriculture should be consulted beforehand.


Advantages Disadvantages/limitations
- Can improve the structure and water-holding capacity of soil

- Low risk of pathogen transmission
- Low costs

- Labour intensive

- Pathogens may exist in a dormant stage (cysts and oocysts) which may become infectious if moisture is added
- Does not replace fertilizer (N, P, K)
- Social acceptance may be low in some areas



Appropriateness

Dried faeces are not as useful as a soil amendment as composted faeces. However, they can help to replenish poor soil and to boost the carbon and water-storing properties of soil, while posing low risk of pathogen transmission.

Health Aspects/Acceptance

The handling and use of dried faeces may not be acceptable to some people. However, because dehydrated faeces should be dry, crumbly, and odour free, using them might be easier to accept than manure or sludge. Dry faeces are a hostile environment for organisms and they do not survive long in it. If water or urine is mixed with the drying faeces, however, odours and organisms may become problematic because bacteria easily survive and multiply in wet faeces. Warm, moist environments are conducive to anaerobic processes, which can generate offensive odours.

Dehydrated faeces should not be applied to crops less than one month before they are harvested. This waiting period is especially important for crops that are consumed raw.

Operation & Maintenance

When removing dehydrated faeces from dehydration vaults, care must be taken to prevent the powder from blowing and being inhaled. Workers should wear appropriate protective clothing. Faeces should be kept as dry as possible. If by accident, water or urine enters and mixes with drying faeces, more ash, lime or dry soil should be added to help absorb the moisture. Prevention is the best way to keep faeces dry.

References

  • Austin, A. and Duncker, L. (2002). Urine-Diversion. Ecological Sanitation Systems in South Africa. CSIR, Pretoria, ZA.
  • Rieck, C., von Münch, E. and Hoffmann, H. (2012). Technology Review of Urine-Diverting Dry Toilets (UDDTs). Overview of Design, Operation, Management and Costs. Deutsche Gesellschaft für Internationale Zusammenarbeit (GIZ) GmbH, Eschborn, DE.
Available at: susana.org/library
  • Schönning, C. and Stenström, T. A. (2004). Guidelines for the Safe Use of Urine and Faeces in Ecological Sanitation Systems. Report 2004-1. EcoSanRes, Stockholm Environment Institute, Stockholm, SE.
Available at: ecosanres.org
  • WHO (2006). Guidelines for the Safe Use of Wastewater, Excreta and Greywater. Volume 4: Excreta and Greywater Use in Agriculture. World Health Organization, Geneva, CH.
Available at: who.int
  • Winblad, U. and Simpson-Hébert, M. (Eds.) (2004). Ecological Sanitation. Revised and Enlarged Edition. Stockholm Environment Institute, Stockholm, SE.
Available at: ecosanres.org

Acknowledgements

Eawag compendium cover.png

The material on this page was adapted from:

Elizabeth Tilley, Lukas Ulrich, Christoph Lüthi, Philippe Reymond and Christian Zurbrügg (2014). Compendium of Sanitation Systems and Technologies, published by Sandec, the Department of Water and Sanitation in Developing Countries of Eawag, the Swiss Federal Institute of Aquatic Science and Technology, Dübendorf, Switzerland.

The 2nd edition publication is available in English. French and Spanish are yet to come.