Difference between revisions of "Groundwater - Stone hammer well drilling"
m (Add NOTOC tag) |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
[[Image:Stone_hammer_well_drilling_icon.png|right]] | [[Image:Stone_hammer_well_drilling_icon.png|right]] | ||
| + | |||
| + | __NOTOC__ | ||
The previous drilling methods are not suitable for hard soil formations, so ongoing development led to the Stone-hammer. This method consists of a heavy hammer hitting directly on a hollow drill-head. Although it does not penetrate very hard stone such as basalt, it is a tougher option than the Rota-sludge method. This technology is being refined further in India and Nicaragua. | The previous drilling methods are not suitable for hard soil formations, so ongoing development led to the Stone-hammer. This method consists of a heavy hammer hitting directly on a hollow drill-head. Although it does not penetrate very hard stone such as basalt, it is a tougher option than the Rota-sludge method. This technology is being refined further in India and Nicaragua. | ||
Revision as of 17:26, 18 January 2008
The previous drilling methods are not suitable for hard soil formations, so ongoing development led to the Stone-hammer. This method consists of a heavy hammer hitting directly on a hollow drill-head. Although it does not penetrate very hard stone such as basalt, it is a tougher option than the Rota-sludge method. This technology is being refined further in India and Nicaragua.
The Stone-hammer method has won a competition for innovative irrigation technologies organized by the World Bank, Winrock and IDE (International Development Enterprises).
| Advantages | Disadvantages |
|---|---|
| Cheaper and easier to maintain than motorized drilling rigs. Drill in very hard soil |
Slower than motorized drilling rigs. |
Capacity
2-5 inch wells to 40 meter.
Costs
20-60% less then hand dug wells.
Applying conditions
Cost of introduction: Variable US$ 15,000 - 30,000 per project, including: production drill set, drawings, hands-on training, first wells.
