Difference between revisions of "Anaerobic Baffled Reactor (ABR) 1"
(→References) |
|||
| (21 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | + | {|style="float: left;" | |
| − | {{ | + | |{{Language-box|english_link=Anaerobic Baffled Reactor (ABR)|french_link=Réacteur_anaérobie_à_chicanes_(semi-)_centralisés|spanish_link=Estanques_de_ Estabilizacion_de_Desperdicios|hindi_link=coming soon|malayalam_link=coming soon|tamil_link=coming soon | korean_link=coming soon | chinese_link=Coming soon | indonesian_link=Coming soon | japanese_link=Coming soon}} |
| − | sys1=[[ | + | |} |
| − | sys2=| | + | {|width="100%" |
| − | sys3=| | + | |style="width:50%;"| |
| − | sys4=| | + | {{santable_new| |
| − | sys5=| | + | sys1=[[Single Pit System|1]]| |
| + | sys2=[[Blackwater Treatment System with Infiltration|6]]| | ||
| + | sys3=[[Blackwater Treatment System with Effluent Transport|7]]| | ||
| + | sys4=[[Blackwater Transport to (Semi-) Centralized Treatment System|8]]| | ||
| + | sys5=[[Sewerage System with Urine Diversion|9]]| | ||
sys6=| | sys6=| | ||
sys7=| | sys7=| | ||
sys8=| | sys8=| | ||
| − | pic= | + | sys9=| |
| − | ApplHousehold= | + | pic=anaerobic baffled reactor.png| |
| + | ApplHousehold=X| | ||
ApplNeighbourhood=XX| | ApplNeighbourhood=XX| | ||
ApplCity=| | ApplCity=| | ||
| − | ManHousehold= | + | ManHousehold=X| |
ManShared=XX| | ManShared=XX| | ||
ManPublic=XX| | ManPublic=XX| | ||
| − | Input1=Blackwater|Input2=Greywater |Input3= | Input4= |Input5=| | + | Input1=Blackwater|Input2=Greywater |Input3=Brownwater | Input4=Effluent |Input5=| |
| − | Output1= | + | Output1= Sludge | Output2=Effluent | Output3= | Output4= | Output5= |
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
}} | }} | ||
| + | |[[Image:anaerobic baffled reactor.png |right|500px]] | ||
| + | |} | ||
| + | <br> | ||
| + | ---- | ||
| + | <br> | ||
| − | [[Image:Icon_waste_stabilization_ponds.png |right| | + | [[Image:Icon_waste_stabilization_ponds.png |right|80px]] |
| − | '''An | + | '''An anaerobic baffled reactor (ABR) is an improved [[Septic Tank]] (S.9) with a series of baffles under which the wastewater is forced to flow. The increased contact time with the active biomass (sludge) results in improved treatment.''' |
| − | The | + | The upflow chambers provide enhanced removal and digestion of organic matter. BOD may be reduced by up to 90%, which is far superior to its removal in a conventional Septic Tank. |
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | digestion of organic matter | ||
| − | up to 90%, which is far superior to | ||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | { | + | ===Design Considerations=== |
| − | - Resistant to organic and hydraulic shock loads | + | The majority of settleable solids are removed in a sedimentation chamber in front of the actual ABR. Small-scale, stand-alone units typically have an integrated settling compartment (as shown in S.10), but primary sedimentation can also take place in a separate [[Settler]] (T.1) or another preceding technology (e.g., existing [[Septic Tank|Septic Tanks]]). Designs without a settling compartment are of particular interest for (Semi-) Centralized Treatment plants that combine the ABR with another technology for primary settling, or where prefabricated, modular units are used. Typical inflows range from 2 to 200 m3 per day. |
| − | - Requires | + | |
| − | + | Critical design parameters include a hydraulic retention time (HRT) between 48 to 72 hours, upflow velocity of the wastewater below 0.6 m/h and the number of upflow chambers (3 to 6). The connection between the chambers can be designed either with vertical pipes or baffles. Accessibility to all chambers (through access ports) is necessary for maintenance. Usually, the biogas produced in an ABR through anaerobic digestion is not collected because of its insufficient amount. The tank should be vented to allow for controlled release of odorous and potentially harmful gases. | |
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | {| border="1" cellpadding="5" cellspacing="0" align="none" | ||
| + | |- | ||
| + | ! width="50%" style="background:#efefef;" | Advantages | ||
| + | ! style="background:#f0f8ff;" | Disadvantages | ||
| + | |- | ||
| + | | valign="top" | | ||
| + | - Resistant to organic and hydraulic shock loads <br> | ||
| + | - No electrical energy is required <br> | ||
| + | - Low operating costs <br> | ||
| + | - Long service life <br> | ||
| + | - High reduction of BOD <br> | ||
| + | - Low sludge production; the sludge is stabilized <br> | ||
| + | - Moderate area requirement (can be built underground) | ||
| + | | valign="top" | | ||
| + | - Requires expert design and construction <br> | ||
| + | - Low reduction of pathogens and nutrients <br> | ||
| + | - Effluent and sludge require further treatment and/or appropriate discharge | ||
| + | |} | ||
| − | |||
| − | This technology is easily adaptable and | + | ===Appropriateness=== |
| − | can be applied at the household level or | + | This technology is easily adaptable and can be applied at the household level, in small neighbourhoods or even in bigger catchment areas. It is most appropriate where a relatively constant amount of blackwater and greywater is generated. A (semi-) centralized ABR is appropriate when there is a pre-existing Conveyance technology, such as a [[Simplified Sewer]] (C.4). |
| − | |||
| − | [[ | ||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | This technology | + | This technology is suitable for areas where land may be limited since the tank is most commonly installed underground and requires a small area. However, a vacuum truck should be able to access the location because the sludge must be regularly removed (particularly from the settler). ABRs can be installed in every type of climate, although the efficiency is lower in colder climates. They are not efficient at removing nutrients and pathogens. The effluent usually requires further treatment. |
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | because | ||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | treatment | ||
| − | + | ===Health Aspects/Acceptance=== | |
| − | + | Under normal operating conditions, users do not come in contact with the influent or effluent. Effluent, scum and sludge must be handled with care as they contain high levels of pathogenic organisms. The effluent contains odorous compounds that may have to be removed in a further polishing step. Care should be taken to design and locate the facility such that odours do not bother community members. | |
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | == | + | ===Operation & Maintenance=== |
| + | An ABR requires a start-up period of several months to reach full treatment capacity since the slow growing anaerobic biomass first needs to be established in the reactor. To reduce startup time, the ABR can be inoculated with anaerobic bacteria, e.g., by adding fresh cow dung or Septic Tank sludge. The added stock of active bacteria can then multiply and adapt to the incoming wastewater. Because of the delicate ecology, care should be taken not to discharge harsh chemicals into the ABR. | ||
| − | + | Scum and sludge levels need to be monitored to ensure that the tank is functioning well. Process operation in general is not required, and maintenance is limited to the removal of accumulated sludge and scum every 1 to 3 years. This is best done using a [[Motorized Emptying and Transport|Motorized Emptying and Transport]] technology (C.3). The desludging frequency depends on the chosen pre-treatment steps, as well as on the design of the ABR. ABR tanks should be checked from time to time to ensure that they are watertight. | |
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | == | + | ===References=== |
| + | * Bachmann, A., Beard, V. L. and McCarty, P. L. (1985). [https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/0043135485903306 Performance Characteristics of the Anaerobic Baffled Reactor] (academic access required). Water Research 19 (1): 99-106. | ||
| − | + | * Barber, W. P. and Stuckey, D. C. (1999). [https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0043135498003716 The Use of the Anaerobic Baffled Reactor (ABR) for Wastewater Treatment: A Review] (academic access required). Water Research 33 (7): 1559-1578. | |
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | The | ||
| − | |||
| − | + | * Foxon, K. M., Buckley, C. A., Brouckaert, C. J., Dama, P., Mtembu, Z., Rodda, N., Smith, M., Pillay, S., Arjun, N., Lalbahadur, T. and Bux, F. (2006). [https://sswm.info/sites/default/files/reference_attachments/FOXON%20et%20al%202006%20Evaluation%20of%20the%20Anaerobic%20Baffled%20Reactor%20for%20Sanitation%20in%20Dense%20Peri%20urban%20Settlements.pdf Evaluation of the Anaerobic Baffled Reactor for Sanitation in Dense Peri-urban Settlements]. WRC Report No 1248/01/06, Water Research Commission, Pretoria, ZA. | |
| − | + | :Available at: [http://www.wrc.org.za wrc.org.za] | |
| − | + | * Foxon, K. M., Pillay, S., Lalbahadur, T., Rodda, N., Holder, F. and Buckley, C. A. (2004). [https://www.researchgate.net/publication/228632608_The_anaerobic_baffled_reactor_ABR_An_appropriate_technology_for_on-site_sanitation The Anaerobic Baffled Reactor (ABR): An Appropriate Technology for on-Site Sanitation]. Water SA 30 (5) (Special Edition). | |
| − | * | + | * Stuckey, D. C. (2010). Anaerobic Baffled Reactor (ABR) for Wastewater Treatment. In: Environmental Anaerobic Technology. Applications and New Developments, H. H. P. Fang (Ed.), Imperial College Press, London, UK. |
| − | * | + | * Ulrich, A. (Ed.), Reuter, S. (Ed.), Gutterer, B. (Ed.), Sasse, L., Panzerbieter, T. and Reckerzügel, T. (2009). [https://wedc-knowledge.lboro.ac.uk/resources/books/DEWATS_-_Chapter_01.pdf Decentralised Wastewater Treatment Systems (DEWATS) and Sanitation in Developing Countries. A Practical Guide]. WEDC, Loughborough University, Leicestershire, UK. |
| − | |||
| − | + | ===Acknowledgements=== | |
| − | + | {{:Acknowledgements Sanitation}} | |
Latest revision as of 19:06, 23 September 2020
|
|
 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
An anaerobic baffled reactor (ABR) is an improved Septic Tank (S.9) with a series of baffles under which the wastewater is forced to flow. The increased contact time with the active biomass (sludge) results in improved treatment.
The upflow chambers provide enhanced removal and digestion of organic matter. BOD may be reduced by up to 90%, which is far superior to its removal in a conventional Septic Tank.
Contents
Design Considerations
The majority of settleable solids are removed in a sedimentation chamber in front of the actual ABR. Small-scale, stand-alone units typically have an integrated settling compartment (as shown in S.10), but primary sedimentation can also take place in a separate Settler (T.1) or another preceding technology (e.g., existing Septic Tanks). Designs without a settling compartment are of particular interest for (Semi-) Centralized Treatment plants that combine the ABR with another technology for primary settling, or where prefabricated, modular units are used. Typical inflows range from 2 to 200 m3 per day.
Critical design parameters include a hydraulic retention time (HRT) between 48 to 72 hours, upflow velocity of the wastewater below 0.6 m/h and the number of upflow chambers (3 to 6). The connection between the chambers can be designed either with vertical pipes or baffles. Accessibility to all chambers (through access ports) is necessary for maintenance. Usually, the biogas produced in an ABR through anaerobic digestion is not collected because of its insufficient amount. The tank should be vented to allow for controlled release of odorous and potentially harmful gases.
| Advantages | Disadvantages |
|---|---|
|
- Resistant to organic and hydraulic shock loads |
- Requires expert design and construction |
Appropriateness
This technology is easily adaptable and can be applied at the household level, in small neighbourhoods or even in bigger catchment areas. It is most appropriate where a relatively constant amount of blackwater and greywater is generated. A (semi-) centralized ABR is appropriate when there is a pre-existing Conveyance technology, such as a Simplified Sewer (C.4).
This technology is suitable for areas where land may be limited since the tank is most commonly installed underground and requires a small area. However, a vacuum truck should be able to access the location because the sludge must be regularly removed (particularly from the settler). ABRs can be installed in every type of climate, although the efficiency is lower in colder climates. They are not efficient at removing nutrients and pathogens. The effluent usually requires further treatment.
Health Aspects/Acceptance
Under normal operating conditions, users do not come in contact with the influent or effluent. Effluent, scum and sludge must be handled with care as they contain high levels of pathogenic organisms. The effluent contains odorous compounds that may have to be removed in a further polishing step. Care should be taken to design and locate the facility such that odours do not bother community members.
Operation & Maintenance
An ABR requires a start-up period of several months to reach full treatment capacity since the slow growing anaerobic biomass first needs to be established in the reactor. To reduce startup time, the ABR can be inoculated with anaerobic bacteria, e.g., by adding fresh cow dung or Septic Tank sludge. The added stock of active bacteria can then multiply and adapt to the incoming wastewater. Because of the delicate ecology, care should be taken not to discharge harsh chemicals into the ABR.
Scum and sludge levels need to be monitored to ensure that the tank is functioning well. Process operation in general is not required, and maintenance is limited to the removal of accumulated sludge and scum every 1 to 3 years. This is best done using a Motorized Emptying and Transport technology (C.3). The desludging frequency depends on the chosen pre-treatment steps, as well as on the design of the ABR. ABR tanks should be checked from time to time to ensure that they are watertight.
References
- Bachmann, A., Beard, V. L. and McCarty, P. L. (1985). Performance Characteristics of the Anaerobic Baffled Reactor (academic access required). Water Research 19 (1): 99-106.
- Barber, W. P. and Stuckey, D. C. (1999). The Use of the Anaerobic Baffled Reactor (ABR) for Wastewater Treatment: A Review (academic access required). Water Research 33 (7): 1559-1578.
- Foxon, K. M., Buckley, C. A., Brouckaert, C. J., Dama, P., Mtembu, Z., Rodda, N., Smith, M., Pillay, S., Arjun, N., Lalbahadur, T. and Bux, F. (2006). Evaluation of the Anaerobic Baffled Reactor for Sanitation in Dense Peri-urban Settlements. WRC Report No 1248/01/06, Water Research Commission, Pretoria, ZA.
- Available at: wrc.org.za
- Foxon, K. M., Pillay, S., Lalbahadur, T., Rodda, N., Holder, F. and Buckley, C. A. (2004). The Anaerobic Baffled Reactor (ABR): An Appropriate Technology for on-Site Sanitation. Water SA 30 (5) (Special Edition).
- Stuckey, D. C. (2010). Anaerobic Baffled Reactor (ABR) for Wastewater Treatment. In: Environmental Anaerobic Technology. Applications and New Developments, H. H. P. Fang (Ed.), Imperial College Press, London, UK.
- Ulrich, A. (Ed.), Reuter, S. (Ed.), Gutterer, B. (Ed.), Sasse, L., Panzerbieter, T. and Reckerzügel, T. (2009). Decentralised Wastewater Treatment Systems (DEWATS) and Sanitation in Developing Countries. A Practical Guide. WEDC, Loughborough University, Leicestershire, UK.
Acknowledgements
The material on this page was adapted from:
Elizabeth Tilley, Lukas Ulrich, Christoph Lüthi, Philippe Reymond and Christian Zurbrügg (2014). Compendium of Sanitation Systems and Technologies, published by Sandec, the Department of Water and Sanitation in Developing Countries of Eawag, the Swiss Federal Institute of Aquatic Science and Technology, Dübendorf, Switzerland.
The 2nd edition publication is available in English. French and Spanish are yet to come.
