Difference between revisions of "Traditional hand-dug wells"
(→Avoid contamination) |
(→Avoid contamination) |
||
| Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
# inability to obtain or maintain pumps or special buckets necessary for small diameter wells | # inability to obtain or maintain pumps or special buckets necessary for small diameter wells | ||
# desire to use some type of water raising system requiring more space than is available in a small diameter well (e.g. continuous chain and buckets) | # desire to use some type of water raising system requiring more space than is available in a small diameter well (e.g. continuous chain and buckets) | ||
| − | # desire to improve or repair existing large diameter wells. | + | # desire to improve or repair existing large diameter wells. |
| − | + | # necessity of storing water where the aquifer is of extremely low permeability | |
| + | # low cost labour and skills are available | ||
| con= | | con= | ||
- greater effort and longer construction time | - greater effort and longer construction time | ||
Revision as of 23:34, 11 April 2012
These are shallow wells which draw water from a natural aquifer or man-made aquifer, e.g. near sand dam or around ponds, but which are not located inside a riverbed. It can include wells that are far from a river, or wells that receive water from shallow aquifers hydraulically connected to the river. Sometimes the holes dug are very large, allowing people and sometimes animals who are able to walk into the well to where the water is located.
Suitable conditions
- Care should be taken to avoid siting wells in perched aquifers (shallow aquifers with limited recharge capacity and water storage).
Avoid contamination
Site wells at a sufficient distance away from sources of contamination. For microbiological contamination, the distance from the source of contamination (e.g. latrine) to the water intake (screen) needs to be sufficient so as to pose a “low” to “very low” risk – this translates into a minimum of 25 days of potential travel of pathogens in the ground. Travel time is influenced by porosity, hydraulic conductivity (permeability) and hydraulic gradient. For medium size sand with an average porosity, the distance equivalent to 25 days is around 30 metres, but this can increase to over 100 metres for coarser sediments. However, the distance from contamination to water intake can reduce significantly where the screen intake is at a sufficient depth – this is due to greater variation of aquifer properties in vertical directions than lateral, meaning that a borehole with handpump could be placed very close to a latrine with low risk. However, screen depth must increase with increased extraction rate.
| Advantages | Disadvantages/limitations |
|---|---|
Circumstances which make the construction of large diameter wells necessary:
|
- greater effort and longer construction time
- greater safety hazards during and after construction |
Technical specification
Operation
Maintenance
Manufacturing
Cost
Country experiences
Manuals
An excellent guide to a relatively safe method of digging hand dug wells can be found at: Consallen
Movies
External links
An excellent but slightly outdated summary of hund dug wells by Koegel is made available by the UN FAO at Large Diameter Wells
An excellent guide by the highly experienced British Drilling Company can be found at Consallen
